Rio Madre de Dios Km. 15, Margen Derecha., 082 Tambopata, Peru
#7 of 7 hotels in Tambopata
Guests' ChoiceBased on 7 hotel reviews
6.8Cleanliness
7.4
Comfort
6.9
Location
9.1
Facilities
6.8
Staff
8.4
Value for money
6.9
Each review score is between 1-10. To get the overall score that you see, we add up all the review scores we’ve received and divide that total by the number of review scores we’ve received. We use a weighted review system which means that the more recent the review, the bigger the impact on the total review score calculation. In addition, guests can give separate ‘subscores’ in crucial areas, such as location, cleanliness, staff, comfort, facilities, value for money and free Wi-Fi. Note that guests submit their subscores and their overall scores independently, so there’s no direct link between them.
You can review an Accommodation that you booked through our Platform if you stayed there or if you arrived at the property but didn’t actually stay there. To edit a review you’ve already submitted, please contact our Customer Service team.
We have people and automated systems that specialise in detecting fake reviews submitted to our Platform. If we find any, we delete them and, if necessary, take action against whoever is responsible.
Anyone else who spots something suspicious can always report it to our Customer Service team, so our Fraud team can investigate.
Ideally, we would publish every review we receive, whether positive or negative. However, we won’t display any review that includes or refers to (among other things):
To make sure reviews are relevant, we may only accept reviews that are submitted within 3 months of checking out, and we may stop showing reviews once they’re 36 months old – or if the Accommodation has a change of ownership.
An Accommodation may choose to reply to a review.
When you see multiple reviews, the most recent ones will be at the top, subject to a few other factors (what language a review is in, whether it’s just a rating or contains comments as well, etc.). If you like, you can sort and/or filter them (by time of year, review score, etc.).
We sometimes show external review scores from other well-known travel websites. We make it clear when we’ve done this.
These guidelines and standards aim to keep the content on Booking.com relevant and family-friendly without limiting expression of strong opinions. They are also applicable regardless of the sentiment of the comment.
Contributions should be travel related. The most helpful contributions are detailed and help others make better decisions. Please don’t include personal, political, ethical, or religious commentary. Promotional content will be removed and issues concerning Booking.com’s services should be routed to our Customer Service or Accommodation Service teams.
Contributions should be appropriate for a global audience. Please avoid using profanity or attempts to approximate profanity with creative spelling, in any language. Comments and media that include 'hate speech', discriminatory remarks, threats, sexually explicit remarks, violence, and the promotion of illegal activity are not permitted.
All content should be genuine and unique to the guest. Reviews are most valuable when they are original and unbiased. Your contribution should be yours. Booking.com property partners should not post on behalf of guests or offer incentives in exchange for reviews. Attempts to bring down the rating of a competitor by submitting a negative review will not be tolerated.
Respect the privacy of others. Booking.com will make an effort to obscure email addresses, telephone numbers, website addresses, social media accounts, and similar details.
The opinions expressed in contributions are those of Booking.com customers and properties and not of Booking.com. Booking.com does not accept responsibility or liability for any reviews or responses. Booking.com is a distributor (without any obligation to verify) and not a publisher of these comments and responses.
By default, reviews are sorted based on the date of the review and on additional criteria to display the most relevant reviews, including but not limited to: your language, reviews with text, and non-anonymous reviews. Additional sorting options may be available (by type of traveller, by score, etc.).
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and non-infringement.
End of dialog content
Showing 1 – 7
Reviewed: 1 October 2023
Toni
New ZealandA few of the facilities could be refurbished. Places like the pool were unusable in the middle of the day because of the sun and bugs. The wifi was broken for 3 days while I stayed.
Great value for money. The staff were very friendly and the guides were knowledgeable.
Stayed in October 2023
Reviewed: 11 April 2025
Cameron
United States• He later spent over 30 minutes aggressively hacking bushes with a machete behind my cabin, in what felt like an intimidation ritual more than maintenance. Several other guests noticed and commented on how unnatural his energy was throughout the trip. • When I tried to speak to him about my concerns, he pretended not to speak English—despite having had fluent conversations with other guests earlier in the day. • I almost slept in the public lodge area that night because I no longer felt safe in my room and had no access to any staff but him. This isn’t speculation. It’s a pattern. Multiple female guests told me they felt “off,” uncomfortable, or watched by him. I saw the signs myself: charm when it benefited him, passive-aggressive control when it didn’t. He wielded his machete like a stage prop and his authority like a weapon. It was disturbing, disorienting, and entirely preventable. Even worse? Lodge management said nothing for days—even after I submitted my concerns directly after leaving. Their first message came only hours before my deadline to post this review, and included no accountability, no apology, and no refund for the experiences and activities missed due to this situation. They claim Justin resigned. Whether or not that’s true, it only happened after I pushed relentlessly and threatened exposure. No action was taken on its own merit. So let me be the one to say it, since the lodge won’t: Justin should never be in a position of power over guests again. Ever. Until Monte Amazonica publicly acknowledges what happened and institutes actual safety protocols for guests—especially women or emotionally vulnerable travelers—I cannot recommend this lodge to anyone. Come for the beauty. Stay for the rainforest. But beware the man who walks with a machete and smiles while isolating you. Because the jungle should feel wild—not predatory.
The jungle was wild—but it wasn’t the animals that made it unsafe. It was the manager. Monte Amazonica Lodge is surrounded by staggering natural beauty, and the potential for a transformative experience is undeniable. The rainforest is mesmerizing. The infrastructure is solid. And the supporting staff—especially Ronal, Rodrigo, and the bartender—are hardworking, grounded, and deeply committed to the guest experience. Ronal in particular made the trip worthwhile with his knowledge, kindness, and professionalism. But none of that can outweigh the deeply disturbing presence of the lodge manager, Justin, whose behavior was not only inappropriate—it was predatory, manipulative, and psychologically unsettling. Let me be absolutely clear: Justin is not simply “awkward” or “bad at hospitality.” He is a man who uses his position of power to insert himself into emotionally vulnerable guests’ personal dynamics, manipulate social environments, and perform dominance under the guise of charm. Here’s what happened: • After I expressed clear discomfort with the dynamic forming between Justin and the guest I arrived with—one that I believe involved inappropriate physical intimacy and psychological grooming—I formally requested a new room. That request was ignored. • That same evening, Justin intentionally placed me and that guest alone at a dinner table, in the middle of the lodge, in full view of everyone. It was a power move—deliberate, uncomfortable, and humiliating.
Stayed in April 2025
Reviewed: 25 January 2025
David
IrelandAll the cottages were made up of two units with no separation between them above and no soundproofing between them. So any talking by your neighbours was heard as well as any other noises they might make. There were no facilities whatsoever for getting clean and dry after taking walks in the forest. All guests were divided into groups so it became rather unclear as to what activities one should pay for. The lodge was poorly lit.
The swimming pool was very nice and a great way to cool off after a walk in the forest. Plenty of seating and hammocks for relaxing. Very ready to cater for vegetarians. The canopy walk was excellent. The guides into the forest and along river were very knowledgeable and pleasant. The kitchen staff were polite and efficient.
Stayed in January 2025
Reviewed: 12 January 2025
Milca
PeruThe unusual sounds of animals at night
Personal muy amable
Stayed in January 2025
Reviewed: 6 July 2024
Mark
GermanyGreat and tasty food, friendly staff
Stayed in July 2024
Reviewed: 14 October 2022
Dilara
BelgiumAs a person travelled 27 countries and earlier worked at hotel business for 3 years, there was a lot of mismanagement in this otherwise piece of heaven. Firstly they do not work with booking.com they have their own agency called Carlos Expeditions and unless you book with them, you slip through the net and you have to chase people (guides) to learn about the daily excursions/plans. That being said, there is no reception/front desk; no-one to address any issues/complaints or ask any questions. There is only Fabrizio as the manager but considering the size of the organisation, one person in charge is ridiculous. The rooms and the dining area are so dirty, you will see dead bugs, cigarette butts and although the shoes are not allowed in the dining area just by walking to your table and back you will have a brown sole of your white socks. Booking.com states there is WIFI which there isn't, there is hint of WIFI by the dining room which only a lucky few are able to connect to. Booking.com states there is laundry, where there isn't and knowing that could be quite useful coming to this establishment right after Inka Trail. And asking for a bucket to self-wash your clothes which never arrives. Coming to the rooms, same as the dining room there are gaps in the nets, in the actual wood pieces of the cabins, in between the door and the floor (even on the mosquito net) which defies the logic of having 4 walls to avoid insects. There are supposed to be functional USB charging stations in the room which of course do not work and your only chance of getting any juice to any electronical item is one of the 3 outlets in the dining room by the pool table if they are not already taken. Because you are not with a package, you will randomly be assigned to sit with a group every meal, a guessing game.
Food was repetitive but good
Stayed in October 2022
Showing 1 – 7
Neusiedl am See, Austria
Mobile, USA
Zadar, Croatia
Lastingham, UK
Condé-sur-Noireau, France
Perm, Russia
Abingdon, UK
Kalpitiya, Sri Lanka
Booking.com is part of Booking Holdings Inc., the world leader in online travel and related services.
We have more than 70 million property reviews, and they're all from real, verified guests.
1
The only way to leave a review is to first make a booking. That's how we know our reviews come from real guests who have stayed at the property.
2
When guests stay at the property they check out how quiet the room is, how friendly the staff are and more.
3
After their trip, guests tell us about their stay. We check for naughty words and verify the authenticity of all guest reviews before adding them to our site.
If you booked through us and want to leave a review, please sign in first.
End of dialog content